Cordial Deconstruction

Observations from our shared single objective reality in a materialistic, naturalistic, & effectively macro-deterministic universe.

  • Recent Posts

  • Comments Are Welcome

  • Recent comments

    Karl Withakay on Deconstruction Review of Fring…
    rich on Deconstruction Review of Fring…
    D. Fosdick on My Reflections on Mark Cuban’s…
    Austin Gray on Deconstruction Review of Fring…
    Karl Withakay on OK, EHarmony Sucks…
  • Categories

  • Archives

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Skeptical Media Links Page Updated

Posted by Karl Withakay on November 14, 2017

For anyone that’s interested, my skeptical media links page has been updated.  There have been a lot of additions in the last year, culminating with links for photos on videos from CSICon 2017 (Link to CSICon web site).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Karl Withakay Skeptical Conference Media Links

Posted by Karl Withakay on November 7, 2016

To provide a small breathe of life into my fallow blog, I have created a page of links to photos and videos that I have shot at various skeptical conferences that I have attended over the years.

Karl Withakay Skeptical Conference Media Links



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

They’re All Unique (Revisiting a Concept from Fringe S2E8: August)

Posted by Karl Withakay on November 27, 2009

In last week’s episode of Fringe, “August”, when August told his fellow Observers that Christine should be saved because she was unique, he was told, “They’re all unique”, implying that while every individual is unique, that does not necessarily make them special or possibly that some people are more unique than others. It reminded me of conflicts I’ve had with various people about the use of the word unique that goes all the way back to my high school English teacher.

There are those who claim it is improper to use a modifier with the word unique, such as in “most unique”, or “very unique” because unique means one of a kind and thus it is an absolute concept. They claim something is either unique or it isn’t, and there is no such thing as “more one of a kind”.

I’m going to give my deconstruction of that claim in two parts. The first is to simply point out that one of the accepted definitions of the word unique is unusual or not typical. Regardless of the original meaning and use of the word, common usage causes language to evolve over time, and that includes the accepted meanings of words. The word unique is by no means unique in this regard. Frankly, Q.E.D.

However, I also contend that it is can often be (edited 12-4-9 to clarify) acceptable to modify the word unique even when it is used to mean one of a kind. Consider a closed universe that contains only seven objects, 6 of the objects are plastic spheres 6 inches in diameter, each one a different color, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and purple. The seventh object is a transparent glass cube 12 inches on each side. Every object in the thought universe is unique, but the cube is more unique than any of the other objects because it has more unique qualities. All the other objects share the qualities of shape, material composition, size, and that fact that they are all colored. The cube is more unique than all the other objects because it shares none of those properties with the other objects.

From a severely literal and scientific perspective, everything in this universe is unique to some degree or other. No two objects are exactly identical down all their individual constituent particles on a quantum level. In fact, if you take any two seemingly identical objects, I’d guess you probably wouldn’t even have to look at the quantum level to find the differences between them. A very close examination under relatively low magnification, say 100X, should be sufficient to find differences between almost any two objects. Even if you had two particles in identical quantum states, they wouldn’t be occupying the exact same position in time and space, and both particles would be unique in some way.

If you can’t have degrees or qualities of uniqueness, then everything is unique, and the word is irrelevant; it would probably be more irrelevant that any other word. 🙂


Posted in Fringe, Television, Thoughtful/Random Observation, Uncategorized | 4 Comments »

North to Alaska!

Posted by Karl Withakay on August 20, 2009

It’s very unlikely there will be any updates in the next 10 or so days.  In the morning my friends and I are flying to Seattle to take a cruise on the Norwegian Star to Alaska.

This note is for anyone who reads this blog that isn’t one of those friends going on the cruise with me.  🙂

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Stop the Presses: AP Reports the Obvious

Posted by Karl Withakay on June 12, 2009

OK, so it’s not exactly a deconstruction, but with the TV season ended, all the best material to deconstruct is gone, so here’s a modest first deconstruction.

Surfing Yahoo sports for NFL news, as I tend to do once I’ve exhausted my favorite science/critical thinking blogs, I discovered a story with  the following headline:

Raise locked up, McNabb wants to win Super Bowl

Maybe the AP didn’t think a story headline  about Eagle’s QB Donavan McNabb getting a raise without a contract extension was attention grabbing  enough, but adding the bit about wanting the win a Super Bowl seems unnecessary.

It’s a well written story, and gives good explanations for why the Eagles would restructure McNabb’s deal for more money over the next two years without giving him an extension, but come on, what NFL player doesn’t want to win a Super Bowl?

I’ve got two more headlines for the AP:

Scientists Report Water is Wet; Fire is Hot

GM: Not Doing So Well

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

First Post: No Deconstruction today.

Posted by Karl Withakay on May 29, 2009

Inasmuch as many others have undertaken to compile web blog accounts of the things going on among us , it seemed fitting for me as well, to write out for you, most excellent web reader, a blog so that you may know my thoughts on things that strike my interest.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

%d bloggers like this: