Cordial Deconstruction

Observations from our shared single objective reality in a materialistic, naturalistic, & effectively macro-deterministic universe.

  • Recent Posts

  • Comments Are Welcome

  • Recent comments

    R Johnson on Traces of Liquid Nitrogen
    World marks 50th ann… on World marks 40th anniversary o…
    Karl Withakay on Deconstruction Review of Fring…
    rich on Deconstruction Review of Fring…
    D. Fosdick on My Reflections on Mark Cuban’s…
  • Categories

  • Archives

Minor comments on Fringe, “Night of Desirable Objects”

Posted by Karl Withakay on September 25, 2009

OK, for a synopsis of this episode, head over to Scott’s review at Polite Dissent.

It was a better episode than the previous one, but again there was nothing major to Deconstruct like an electron microscope record player that reads embedded sound waves off of a glass pane, so it’s another post of minor comments.

Comments:

Sheriff Golytely, are you serious with that name?  How did Scott miss that one?

I miss the “Fringe will return in xx seconds” messages, it took all the guesswork out of skipping commercials.

The giant periodic table on the wall tells us that room was a lab, because most labs have giant periodic tables on the wall, right?

It is nice to see a TV show or movie where scars and bruises actually persist from one episode to another.

Where did all the dirt go?  If you did a hole/tunnel as big as the ones the creature dug in this episode, you have to do something with all the dirt.  For example: there was a large hold dug through the bottom of the coffin through which the creature escaped, but there was no dirt in the coffin.  Dig a tunnel much bigger than a mole hole, and you won’t be able to just compress the dirt around the hole; you’ve got to excavate it and dispose of the dirt somewhere.

Watch the following films for examples of dirt disposal from tunneling:

The Great Escape

The McKenzie Break

Best line,  “We’re all victims of our own gene pool, someone must have peed in yours.”  -Walter Bishop to Sherriff Golytely

Which universe is the show set in where an FBI agent can negligently discharge her firearm in a civilian’s house and not at least face an automatic review process?

I need to write a post on my thoughts on parallel universes and how similar or different I think they could be to our own.  (Put simply, I think they’d either be identical or completely dissimilar, bearing no resemblance to ours to the level of different starts and galaxies forming or even totally different sets of physical laws and universal constants.

Momentum does not appear to be conserved between the universes.  That is to say, if Olivia’s body is imparted with momentum from a car crashing in to her vehicle in this universe,that momentum does not carry over when she is transported to the parallel universe (she didn’t fly into the parallel universe), but is contained in this universe, waiting for her return.  This creates some very interesting implications and conundrums for conservation of mass-energy between universes:  Momentum can not be exchanged between the universes, but mass-energy can…There’s an entire post there as well.


Posted in Fringe, Quotes, Science, Television | Leave a Comment »

Peter Anspach: A Modern Machiavelli?

Posted by Karl Withakay on September 21, 2009

If you are not familiar with the Evil Overlord List, I encourage you to check it out.  It’s basically a list of all the mistakes made by evil rulers in the movies and on television that lead to their downfall, presented as a what to do/ not to do list.

It struck out of the blue this past weekend that this list is essentially a modern version of Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince.   The Prince is basically a practical treatise on how a prince might gain and keep power including what pitfalls to avoid and what actions to take, and this is exactly what the Evil Overlord List is.

Link to a simpler summary of The Prince

Both works espouse rule by force rather than law, both dispassionately advocate  cold and ruthless actions to keep and maintain power, as well as offering advice on on what actions to avoid.  Both offer advice as to the types of forces used to seize and maintain power, how to fortify strongholds, what to look for in henchmen/advisers/ministers, etc.

I just wanted to share this insight on these two greats works regarding maintaining power.  That is all.

Posted in Deadpan, History, Humor, Internet, Literature, Thoughtful/Random Observation | 1 Comment »

Minor Comments on a Ho-hum Episode of Fringe

Posted by Karl Withakay on September 18, 2009

A rather lackluster episode to start the season that was mostly exposition for the rest of the season rather than an attention grabber to reel you in.  It would have been ho-hum for regular episode;  it was disappointing for a season premier that’s supposed to set the pace for the season to follow.

Since my friend Scott already does the heavy lifting in writing a synopsis of the episode, why duplicate quality work?   Link to Scott’s Review of Fringe: A New Day In an Old Town

It didn’t contain much worth Deconstructing, and so I was doubly disappointed.

Comments:

Did Walter undo the seat belt when he was examining the car, and if so, is he responsible for Olivia flying out of the car?  Would she have materialized inside the fastened seat belt and not crashed through the window?

I might need to re-watch the season finale from last season in order to make a possible comment about conservation of momentum between the multiverses and the car accident, but I don’t have it anymore.

Do FBI agents need search warrants anymore?  It sure looks like they just busted into that guy’s home without even announcing themselves.  What judge would grant a warrant on the evidence Jessup had anyway?

Is Astrid in some kind of disciplinary program in the FBI that she is relegated to coffee girl duty in the Fringe division?  How come the FBI forgot to reassign her when they shut down the Fringe division?  (I can forgive the continued occupation of Walter’s lab with the excuse that the rent is payed through the end of the month.)  This is a pathetically underused character in the show;  I’d be interested in seeing the writers make more use of her in at least one episode.

Why doesn’t anyone have any common sense anytime a doppelganger is involved, especially ones so easily detected by close physical examination?  ANYTIME AND EVERY TIME a doppleganger has been involved, and someone has been by themselves or away from the rest of the group, CHECK THEM OUT, NO EXCEPTIONS !!!

It’s interesting to note that the Fringe division of the FBI has direct congressional oversight.  I wonder how many other subdivisions of the FBI have such status?

Posted in Fringe, Science, Television | 1 Comment »

A Link to a Post for Fans of Physics and Superheroes

Posted by Karl Withakay on September 3, 2009

I’m still getting things back in order from my vacation, and don’t have anything to Deconstruct yet, but….

Here’s a link to a post my friend Scott should like.

The Semi-Amazing Spider-Man

It doesn’t feature medicine, but it does cover comics and science.

It’s a fairly simple discussion of the physics and reality of the typical superhero catch of a falling person from a high school physics level.  (That is to say the discussion is from a high school physics level, not the fall.)

Posted in Heads Up, Science | Leave a Comment »

North to Alaska!

Posted by Karl Withakay on August 20, 2009

It’s very unlikely there will be any updates in the next 10 or so days.  In the morning my friends and I are flying to Seattle to take a cruise on the Norwegian Star to Alaska.

This note is for anyone who reads this blog that isn’t one of those friends going on the cruise with me.  🙂

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

No Deconstruction Neccessary

Posted by Karl Withakay on August 10, 2009

Gee, I’m almost disappointed.

David B. Caruso of the Associated Press wrote an article, “Immune system cancer found in young 9/11 officers” that immediately raised my guard based on the headline.  I was prepared for a typical, sensationalistic article based on Post Hoc Ergo Prompter Hoc fallacies, anecdotes, and an ignorance of statistics.  Instead, I was pleasantly surprised.

It was a well written article.  It presented the facts objectively, didn’t cherry pick details to support an agenda or skew the story, and made no unsuported conclusions.  Additionally, the conclusions that were drawn were very reserved and reasonable.

Points made in the article:

-Numbers of incidence of multiple myeloma in the sample are tiny.

-Numers of incidence are within predicted parameters, but high for one age group in question.
(8 cases, but 4 under 45: should only be 1 under 45)

-Currently no evidence to support causation.

-Number could be result of increased medical scrutiny the group has been subjected to.  (Will Rogers Effect, see http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=116)

-Continued, increased  surveillance is advised.

-Timing is in question as research show that not enough time had  passed for multiple myeloma to develope due to environmental exposeure to a carcinogen, suggesting a non-causal relationship to 9/11.

I was even more surprised to learn from Googling his name that David Caruso does not appear to be a dedicated science reporter.  Maybe there’s hope for mainstream science reporting these days after all, even from non science reporters.

I though that Mr. Caruso deserved a Kudo for the kind of quality repoting that is increasingly rare these days:  Way to go David!  🙂

Posted in Critical Thinking, Heads Up, Kudos, Medicine / Health, Science, Skepticism, Yahoo Features | Leave a Comment »

Coin Flipping Isn’t Exactly Random

Posted by Karl Withakay on August 3, 2009

If you’re like me, and I know I am (as my high school art teacher used to say), you’ll find the following article about coin flipping very interesting.

I always knew that technically, flipping a coin is not random, and that given enough information on the input conditions, you’d be able to predict the outcome of any given coin flip.  The academics in the article showed this by building their robotic coin flipper that flips a coin to heads every time.

What I didn’t know, and learned from this article, is that the initial position of the coin (heads up vs heads down) when filipping  inherantly affects the result of the coin toss.  Apparently a coin flip is a 51-49 proposition if you know which side is facing up when the coin is flipped.

The article mentions that the coin flip shouldn’t be eliminated from  sports such as football, because to get the advantage, you have to know the initial position of the coin.  However, I wonder whether people wouldn’t naturally tend to start out with the coin in the heads up position when flipping.  We’re not just talking about pulling a quarter out of you pocket and flipping it.  In the NFL, the officials make a big deal out of showing the captains from each team both sides of the coin and explaining which is heads and which is tails.  (They use special large NFL coins for the toss in the NFL.)  I would think that it is natural human tendency to start out with the coin face up (heads) when flipping a coin if you’re paying attention to which side is up to start.

I always scoff when Jim Hanifan insists you should always call heads on a coin toss, but IF officials tend to flip the coin with the heads side facing  up (and I admit I only have my intuition to support this hypothesis),  than there is a slightly higher chance of winning the coin toss by calling heads, 51%.

Maybe old Jim knows what he’s talking about after all.

Posted in Science | Leave a Comment »

Eureka: Recycling Bad SF Physics.

Posted by Karl Withakay on July 27, 2009

Eureka

Eureka

This post kind of goes off on a tangent for a while, but I felt it was necessary to give an insight to my thought processes regarding deconstruction science fiction in general, seeing as this is my first sci-fi deconstruction.

It’s not my intention to do much deconstruction of the show Eureka, mostly because the show doesn’t take itself as seriously as, say, Fringe does, but this week’s episode, “Insane in the P-Brane” the writers went to the classic sci-fi plot file drawer and pulled out the “We’ve been shifted to another dimension  and nobody can see us.” plot, and recycled the plot point’s huge holes along with it.

It seems like every SF series has to do the episode where one or more characters somehow gets shifted out of phase, into another dimension, or is otherwise modified such that nobody can see them and they can’t interact with the world around them.  Star Trek TNG, StarGate SG-1, and numerous others have done it.   So aside from the bad physics plot points it always creates, it smacks of lazy writing to recycle the idea, especially since nobody ever manages to take that idea and make it their own by doing something really different with it.   Note to Sci-Fi writers out there:  Feel free to recycle a plot idea, but be sure to do something different with it to differentiate your story from every one else’s.

It’s not really fair to deconstruct science fiction in the same way you would a spy thriller.  Almost all science fiction includes elements that are against the known laws of physics, and are just not possible in reality, and Eureka is a fairly over the top show in that regard.  So, when deconstructing science fiction, you have to draw the lines of what you’ll accept and what is BS.

There are a couple of keys to creating an acceptable science fiction universe:  explanation and consistency.

#1  Explanation:  First establish a (fictional) explanation for a phenomenon to make it acceptable.*  As bad as a movie and as riddled with bad physics as The Core was, I give the nod to them, on Unobtainium.  By calling the hull material unobtainium, they basically acknowledged to us that the properties of the hull alloy they put in the story were BS asked us to accept it and move on, and there’s nothing wrong with that in science fiction.

#2  Consistency:  Once you define your sci-fi universe, it has to be internally self consistent.  That’s not to say that you’re necessarily locked into the universe as you defined it, but you must at least provide an explanation for any changes that contradict the previously established laws of your universe.  You can’t have warp drive tearing holes in time and space in one episode and forget about it while blazing away at warp 9 in later episodes unless you explain that new technology has been introduced to correct the issue.

Implied by #’s 1 & 2 is that any sci-fi universe is pretty much governed by the same rules as our own, except as otherwise specified.  This may seem blindingly obvious, but this Zeroth Key (With a nod to the Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics) is the basis for most of my science fiction deconstruction as you’ll soon see below.

I’m not going to deal with the specifics of this  Eureka episode, but I will instead address the plot point in general.  I’ll also add that in science fiction, I am more likely to accept a sci-fi plot point with gaping  holes in it if it’s the first time that plot point has been used.  I’ll have less tolerance for followup uses of that plot point that continue to fail to address those same holes.

For the sake of science fiction, I will accept that a person could be phase or dimension shifted such that they cannot interact with the rest of the world, but let’s look into what that would actually mean.

In the universe we live in, which is the only one we know about, there are four funamental forces through which all things can interact, and all interactions between any matter or energy involve these four forces.

Without going into physics 101, electromagnitism is the force most responsible for our interaction with the world around us.  The ability to see light, feel heat, and touch objects is all a result of the matter in our bodies interacting through the electromagnetic force with the matter and energy around us.

The plot holes in dimension/phase shifting mostly revolve around  gravity and electromagnetism.  If you’re phase shifted from the rest of the universe and can’t interact with it, you should no longer be attracted to the Earth by the force of gravity, since the Earth is in a different phase or dimension, and your momentum from before you were shifted should cause you to be flung tangentially off of the face of the earth.

For the sake of plot convenience, let’s assume that the force of gravity permeates dimensions/phases such that you can still interact gravitationally with the rest of the universe unaffected by your shift.  (We have to assume the strong and weak nuclear forces do not permeate phases, or there would be  all sorts of nasty, but interesting nuclear interactions to occur as you interact with  matter from the normal world with out the benefit of electromagnetic repulsion.)  In that case, you should fall through the surface Earth ending up in a nearly linear, highly elliptical orbit around the Earth’s center of mass ranging from surface to surface since you can no more interact with the stuff the Earth is made of than you can the stuff other people and door knobs are made of.

Speaking of door knobs, how come these plot points always involve normal world humans walking through the phase shifted people, but the phase shifted people almost never just walk through walls to get to where they’re going?  I mean, they can walk through other people, they can’t interact with the computers to type out a cry for help, but they are somehow blocked from passing through the walls and floors without at least a made up explanation, what’s the deal?

Another thing to consider is that the phase shifted persons should not be able to see anything of the unshifted world (or themselves unless they posses their own light source), as their eyes cannot interact with the unshifted photons of light from the rest of the universe.  We’ll have to stipulate that the phase shifted persons can somehow interact with photons (energy), but not matter from the unshifted world if we want them to be able to see.   This would also slow down the rate at which they freeze to death:  they could then receive heat from the sun and   surrounding matter via thermal radiation, but not via conduction or convection.

Of course, all this is also ignoring that fact that the shifted persons should not be  able to breath unshifted air, and should therefore suffocate fairly quickly.

So, can one use the phase/dimension shifting plot point and avoid some or most of these plot holes?  Here’s my plot outline of a phase shifting story that minimizes the holes.  A ship’s engine’s fail in the dead of interstellar space.  One or more crew members must go EVA to fix the problem, and there is some soft of “event” that causes them to be phase shifted, and they are stranded with a finite amount of life support and thruster jet fuel left in their EVA suits.  They must find a way to return themselves to normal or at least alert the ship to their predicament before either their life support runs out or the ship is repaired and leaves them behind.

The action of the story focuses on the actions of the rest of the crew as they try to determine what happened to their crew mates and the interaction between the two shifted crew members as they try to resolve their situation.   (They can see each other via the lights on their suits.)

AFTER POST UPDATES BELOW:

* This can also be thought of as acknowledging the absurdity.  By acknowledging the absurdity, you premptively point out your own plot hole instread of leaving it to the viewer to criticize.

I forgot to add the sound perception plot hole.   Even if you stipulate that shifted persons can see the non-shifted world via some sort of two way mirror effect for photons from the non-shifted world, if they can’t interact with matter from the non-shifted world, then they shouldn’t be able to hear anything from the non-shifted world as their ear drums cannot interact with the air molecules in which sound from the unshifted world propogates.

Posted in Eureka, Science, Space, Television | Leave a Comment »

World marks 40th anniversary of NASA screwing it up for everybody else.

Posted by Karl Withakay on July 20, 2009

Today is the 40th anniversary of the day NASA set an unreasonably high benchmark for every other human effort by successfully landing two men on the moon and returning them back to the Earth 4 days later alive and well.  Ever since then scientists, engineers, and other people in all walks of life have had to deal with an unreasonably high benchmark for human achievement, frequently having listen to others complain, “How come we can put a man on the moon, but we can’t have a VCR or microwave clock that won’t lose the time when the power goes out?”

One can only guess that Neil Armstrong must regret his involvement in the mission as he’s probably never been able to get out of a single household chore since the day he landed, likely having had to listen to his wife say “You mean to tell me you can land on the moon and come back, but you can’t go to the store and pick up some groceries or do a simple job like cleaning the gutters?” on more than one occasion.

NASA, to its credit, has attempted to rectify the situation on several occasions.  However, one of the first major attempts to rectify the situation was an uncategorical failure.  NASA seemed to have reduced everyone’s expectations by incorrectly grinding the main mirror for the Hubble Space Telescope, but then screwed it up by ingenuously fixing the telescope in space, setting the expectation that any failure, no matter how big, could now be turned into a stunning success.

NASA is now of victim of its own success and further pathetic attempts to rectify the situation, such as incorrectly mixing English and metric units on the Mars Climate Orbiter mission have failed to reduce expectations set by the “Apollo Standard”, and have actually subjected NASA itself to criticisms such as, “How come NASA can put a man on the moon, but they can’t figure out the metric system?”

One can only hope that the inevitable first mission to Mars will take a colossal wrong turn and end up on the strip in downtown Las Vegas instead of Mars.

Seriously, though, the Apollo program was (in my opinion) one of the top three achievements in the history of space exploration, which are,  (in no particular order)  Apollo, Voyager, and the Hubble.

If you want an actual Apollo related Deconstruction, I don’t stand a chance of doing it as well as Phil Plait has done over at the Bad Astronomy site.

(This blog post is partly inspired by a Jerry Seinfeld stand up routine.)

Posted in Deadpan, Humor, Science, Space | 2 Comments »

My First Nutjob Commenter

Posted by Karl Withakay on July 17, 2009

I must be doing something right.  I’m not exactly in danger of giving  PZ Meyers a run for his money, but I managed to attract my first nutjob commenter.

  1. davemabus Says:
    July 17, 2009 at 3:24 pm edithttp://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/18119

    How we terminated the Randi Paranormal Challenge

I originally flagged the comment as spam, but after doing a little research, I determined it’s not spam, just crazy.

I mark it as a badge of honor that I’ve managed to attract a crazy commenter already, and so I approved the comment.

If this blog ever manages to generate any following outside of people who actually know me, I’m sure I’ll rue the day I got my first nutjob comment, but for now, it’s actually pretty cool!

Posted in Critical Thinking | Leave a Comment »