Cordial Deconstruction

Observations from our shared single objective reality in a materialistic, naturalistic, & effectively macro-deterministic universe.

  • Recent Posts

  • Comments Are Welcome

  • Recent comments

    R Johnson on Traces of Liquid Nitrogen
    World marks 50th ann… on World marks 40th anniversary o…
    Karl Withakay on Deconstruction Review of Fring…
    rich on Deconstruction Review of Fring…
    D. Fosdick on My Reflections on Mark Cuban’s…
  • Categories

  • Archives

Archive for the ‘Television’ Category

Flash Forward Gets Schrödinger’s Cat a Little Wrong

Posted by Karl Withakay on October 29, 2009

Tonight’s episode of Flash Forward, “Scary Monsters and Super Creeps” contained a flawed portrayal of the Schrödinger’s Cat thought experiment (note the 2 separate links) in a conversation where a quantum physicist is trying to pick up a hot woman on a train by telling her he can explain what caused the flash forward.  After mentioning that the most basic concept she needed to understand was quantum superpositions, they have some witty flirting and then the conversation proceeds as follows:

Physicist:  “Imagine you have a cat, a teeny tiny cat that fits in the palm of your hand.  You also have a poisonous sardine.  Once we close your palm there are two possible scenarios: either the cat eats the sardine and dies or the cat doesn’t eat the sardine and lives.  Quantum physics says until we open your hand to discover the cat’s fate, both eventualities occur at the same time.  For us, the cat is both living and deceased.”

Hot Woman  “But how can that be?”

Physicist:  “That’s the miracle of quantum mechanics.  The observer get to decide.”

The problem is that this thought experiment leaves out an important element of the original, a quantum probability.  In the original experiment, the cat’s life or death is dependent not on a poisoned sardine, but on the potential decay of a radioactive isotope source.  If the source decays and emits a decay particle, a hammer triggered by a Geiger counter breaks a vial of poison, killing the cat; otherwise the cat lives.  The key is that the decay or non-decay of the isotope is a quantum probability, whereas the cat eating a poisoned sardine is not.

Schrödinger originated this thought experiment in an attempt to illustrate what he saw as a flaw in the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.  According to quantum mechanics, the cat is both alive and dead (because the isotope has both decayed and not decayed) until the observer collapses the quantum wave function by observing the state of the cat (which is dependent on the state of the isotope), even though common sense says the cat was obviously either dead or alive before being observed.  The experiment also has nothing to do with the observer “deciding” anything.  The act of observation collapses the quantum wave function to one state or the other, but no choice of states is involved or possible.

The Flash Forward thought experiment was an not an example of quantum superposition since no quantum state was involved, and it wasn’t Schrödinger’s/Schroedinger’s Cat.

Posted in Flash Forward, Science, Television | Tagged: , , , | 11 Comments »

Traces of Liquid Nitrogen

Posted by Karl Withakay on October 21, 2009

Tonight’s episode of NCIS, “Code of Conduct” featured the murder of a US Marine by ingestion of liquid nitrogen (LN2).  We are told by the forensic pathologist, Dr. Donald “Ducky” Mallard, played by David McCallum (fans of classic TV may know him better as Illya Kuryakin in The Man From Uncle) that the Marine “…ingested enough nitrogen to freeze his internal organs, but technically that was not the cause of death.” The Assistant medical examiner tells us that the cause of death was actually breathing, “The nitrogen gas entered his lungs, essentially suffocating him.”  Ducky also tells us that the victim lived on for several minutes after ingestion of the liquid nitrogen, and that “single gulp” was all that was necessary to kill the Marine.

It’s late, and although it would be an interesting and relatively easy exercise in math & chemistry I haven’t used since college (specific heat capacities, heat of vaporization of N2, heat of fusion of water, etc) to determine how much liquid nitrogen would be needed to freeze a human’s internal organs, I don’t feel like taking the time do it now.  Maybe I’ll do it before watching Mythbusters tomorrow.

What I do want to first address is the claim that the victim was asphyxiated when the nitrogen gas (produced when the liquid nitrogen in his stomach boiled) entered his lungs.  I’m not a doctor, but I see a few things wrong with this concept.  Problem one is that the stomach does not really  have a direct connecting pathway to the lungs.  I suppose you could argue that he essentially burped up so much nitrogen from his stomach, that it displaced the air around his nose and mouth so that he was only able to breathe nitrogen.  However, I’m thinking that his throat would have likely been frozen shut by the liquid nitrogen and that he would have choked to death instead.  It might also be possible for his carotid artery to have frozen shut and for him to have essentially died of a stroke.  I could be mistaken on htese points, and I’m hoping my friend Scott will chime in with a comment or two on this.

Also, several references were made in the episode to “traces of liquid nitrogen” being found or detected.  At atmospheric pressure and temperatures above 37K (-196C) nitrogen is a gas, and would not generally leave “traces” behind that would indicate that LN2 had previously been present.

Finally, it is claimed that the LN2 was stored in a lunchbox thermos, and it is implied that the victim may have drank the contents of the thermos on his own (rather than being forced to drink it) because he was caught unaware by the contents of the thermos.  I cry BS raise my eyebrow on both of these ideas.  I doubt that a lunchbox thermos would contain any LN2 for long enough to be used in this way.  Without a pressure relief valve, there’s a good chance it would pop its top off in less than a few hours.  I also doubt that the thermos wouldn’t have been cold enough for the victim to notice something was fishy; it’s a thermos, not a laboratory grade vacuum flask.

Posted in NCIS, Science, Television | 3 Comments »

Minor Comments on Fringe Episode 5, Season 2: Dream Logic

Posted by Karl Withakay on October 16, 2009

As always, a synopsis can be found over at Polite Dissent.

“Shock Induced Achromotricia”

Shock can not change hair color.  In fact, short of a color job, nothing changes the color of EXISTING hair.  Hair is not alive, and does not change color. (I suppose it could fade from exposure to strong sunlight.)  When you “go gray”, new hair growth is gray, not existing hair.  Once hair is produced, that part stays the same.

Massive Dynamic

Not a comment about this episode in particular, but this company’s name seems more appropriate for a company in a comic book rather than a prime time drama.

Remote Backup

The doctor told Olivia, “The patients’ files are backed up on a remote server; I’ll give you the password.”  Gee, how about the username and maybe even the address of the site or remote server to log into?  Those might be useful too.

MK Ultra

I’m not too surprised Walter was involved in MK Ultra.  Apparently Walter had no ethics whatsoever; the Canadian experiments were especially reprehensible.

Felony Assault

Drugging a person against their will constitutes felony assault, and assaulting a federal agent is a very serious federal crime, and this is not even considering the civil liability he faces should the agent decide to sue.

Low Quality Dream Sniffer

All the network sniffing tools I’ve ever used work in passive mode, such that they can eavesdrop on data traffic without anyone noticing rather than intercepting and redirecting the traffic away from the intended destination.  You’d think that would be the better way to design a dream sniffer as well.

Addiction does not lead to Dissociative Identity Disorder

Olivia seems to be confusing manic mood swings with DID, which is commonly referred to as multiple personality disorder.

Olivia Dunham: Handwriting Expert?

I’ll grant you that the g’s were very similar and fairly unique, but the F’s were about as generic looking as you can make an F.  I’d tell Olivia to stick to what she’s good at, but we haven’t figured out what that is yet because it isn’t being an FBI investigator.

Prop Convenience Theater

Other than our benefit so we know whose brain he is jacking into, is there any good reason why the doctor’s computer displays a full screen image of his victim?

Full Service Airways

That was an awfully small sea plane to need two pilots AND a stewardess.

Parallel Universe Hint and Space Trivia

The poster on the wall in Peter’s dream features an image of the Space Shuttle Challenger (OV-099) in space with the words, “Challenger Mission 11” and “June 28, 1984” on it.  There was no mission 11 for Challenger; it was destroyed 73 seconds after liftoff during mission 10, STS-51-L on January 28, 1986.  This is further evidence that this Peter Bishop is originally from the parallel universe and was kidnapped and brought to our universe by our Walter bishop after the death of his son in this universe.  It is also interesting to note the difference in the time lines between the two universes.  By my estimate, our  Challenger’s 11th mission should have been around mid 1986, about two years after the parallel universe’s Challenger mission 11.

TRIVIA: According to Wikipedia, Challenger’s next mission, mission 11, would have been the deployment of the Ulysses probe with the Centaur to study the polar regions of the Sun.  Ulysses is only one of 8 man made objects to travel as far as Jupiter or beyond.  The others are Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, Voyagers 1 & 2, Galileo, Cassini-Huygens, and New Horizons.

Missed Deconstruction

I forgot to comment that the lack of DDOS attacks does not support the idea that the computer was not hacked, but Scott took care of that on his post.

About This Post:

You’ll have to forgive me if this post is not properly proof-read.  Somehow my WordPress session timed out while I was composing this, and I lost half my post when I clinked the publish button.  Only what was auto-saved as a draft before the session timed out survived.  I had to type a good portion over again, and I don’t feel like doing a quality proof read before going to bed for the night.  I still haven’t watched The Office, 30 Rock, or The Mentalist; one or more will have to probably have to wait since it’s 11:20PM now.  There’s too many shows on Thursday this season.  😦

Posted in Fringe, Prop Convenience Theater, Science, Television | 4 Comments »

Minor Comments on Fringe Episode 4, Season 2: Momentum Deferred

Posted by Karl Withakay on October 9, 2009

Check out Scott’s site if you want a synopsis of this weeks episode.

It’s nice to see they did address my question regarding conservation of momentum, sort of.

Walter didn’t say whether the doppelganger’s blood was 47% mercury by mass, volume, or by mole.

Logically, it is likely to be by mass (as in 47% of the doppelganger’s blood weight was mercury), otherwise with the density of mercury being 13.5X that of blood, and blood normally consisting of 7% of human body weight, my math works out that if a doppelganger’s blood were 47% mercury by volume, they would weight about 40% more than the human they are mimicking; that shouldn’t be too hard to detect, even for Olivia.

Has anyone thought to assign Astrid to spend a few days watching all of Walter’s old video tapes and logging a summary of each one rather than waiting for Walter to remember when they seem to be relevant? Oh wait, Olivia’s in field command of the Fringe division- never mind, she probably hasn’t thought of it.

Was that maybe a little too much mercury to be produced form a bunch of health thermometers? (I’m not sure on this one.) Regardless, If I needed a bunch of Hg, I would have gotten a bunch of mercury switches from an electrical/appliance supply store instead.

Theressa Russell has held up pretty well, and is still a very attractive woman.

The writers of Fringe don’t seem to understand the Pauli Exclusion Principle at all. It does not state that two objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time. It states that no two identical fermions can occupy the same quantum state at the same time, and does not even apply to all matter/particles, such as bosons.

Olivia Dunham must be the dumbest and most gullible agent in the entire FBI to have at least not been a little suspicious of Charlie’s text message.

You have just found out there is a dangerous doppelganger still alive out there that can look like anyone.  You have a means of determining if someone is a doppelganger with a simple close visual inspection.

Do you:

A.  Recall your entire team to headquarters and immediately perform the inspections and institute daily inspections of the team going forward?

B.  Have the person last known to be in the presence of a doppelganger immediately inspected?

C.  Take the word of the person last in the presence of the doppelganger that the person helping you (that you were told to trust by the only person who has any clue what is going on) is the doppelganger and then eagerly reveal to the person last in the presence of the doppelganger a vital piece of intelligence without hesitation?

Guess which choice Olivia made?

That is all for now.

Posted in Fringe, Science, Television | Leave a Comment »

Minor Comments on Fringe Episode 3, Season 2: “Fracture”

Posted by Karl Withakay on October 2, 2009

I assume by the time anyone reads this, Scott should have his synopsis up over at Polite Dissent. Since I am writing this before Scott posts his review for a change, some of this may already be covered by Scott.

The trans-formative serum sounds like some form or variation of  Ice Nine in its ability to solidify water.

Cyanogen Chloride is a blood agent, not a neurotoxin/ nerve agent.

331.6 Mhz is in the UHF range, not VHF.   (Do the writers not have internet access?)

Apparently, both your arms can almost completely crystallize due to the effects of  the trans-formative serum, but the effect goes away if the frequency is discontinued before the full 30 seconds, leaving no damage or significant after effects.

I am always skeptical of scenes where a person draws a gun on someone they obviously have no intention of possibly shooting for the purpose of compelling them to cooperate.  It’s a gun, not a magic lasso.  (Comic Book reference just for Scott)

Trivia:

The newspaper being read by the police office at the start of the episode contained stories with the following headlines:

High Court Hints at Caution on Sentencing

Death Spurs Debate of Surveillance Cameras

——————————————————————-

That’s all for now; I may revise this or add more comments after reading Scott’s post.

Posted in Fringe, Science, Television | Leave a Comment »

Minor comments on Fringe, “Night of Desirable Objects”

Posted by Karl Withakay on September 25, 2009

OK, for a synopsis of this episode, head over to Scott’s review at Polite Dissent.

It was a better episode than the previous one, but again there was nothing major to Deconstruct like an electron microscope record player that reads embedded sound waves off of a glass pane, so it’s another post of minor comments.

Comments:

Sheriff Golytely, are you serious with that name?  How did Scott miss that one?

I miss the “Fringe will return in xx seconds” messages, it took all the guesswork out of skipping commercials.

The giant periodic table on the wall tells us that room was a lab, because most labs have giant periodic tables on the wall, right?

It is nice to see a TV show or movie where scars and bruises actually persist from one episode to another.

Where did all the dirt go?  If you did a hole/tunnel as big as the ones the creature dug in this episode, you have to do something with all the dirt.  For example: there was a large hold dug through the bottom of the coffin through which the creature escaped, but there was no dirt in the coffin.  Dig a tunnel much bigger than a mole hole, and you won’t be able to just compress the dirt around the hole; you’ve got to excavate it and dispose of the dirt somewhere.

Watch the following films for examples of dirt disposal from tunneling:

The Great Escape

The McKenzie Break

Best line,  “We’re all victims of our own gene pool, someone must have peed in yours.”  -Walter Bishop to Sherriff Golytely

Which universe is the show set in where an FBI agent can negligently discharge her firearm in a civilian’s house and not at least face an automatic review process?

I need to write a post on my thoughts on parallel universes and how similar or different I think they could be to our own.  (Put simply, I think they’d either be identical or completely dissimilar, bearing no resemblance to ours to the level of different starts and galaxies forming or even totally different sets of physical laws and universal constants.

Momentum does not appear to be conserved between the universes.  That is to say, if Olivia’s body is imparted with momentum from a car crashing in to her vehicle in this universe,that momentum does not carry over when she is transported to the parallel universe (she didn’t fly into the parallel universe), but is contained in this universe, waiting for her return.  This creates some very interesting implications and conundrums for conservation of mass-energy between universes:  Momentum can not be exchanged between the universes, but mass-energy can…There’s an entire post there as well.


Posted in Fringe, Quotes, Science, Television | Leave a Comment »

Minor Comments on a Ho-hum Episode of Fringe

Posted by Karl Withakay on September 18, 2009

A rather lackluster episode to start the season that was mostly exposition for the rest of the season rather than an attention grabber to reel you in.  It would have been ho-hum for regular episode;  it was disappointing for a season premier that’s supposed to set the pace for the season to follow.

Since my friend Scott already does the heavy lifting in writing a synopsis of the episode, why duplicate quality work?   Link to Scott’s Review of Fringe: A New Day In an Old Town

It didn’t contain much worth Deconstructing, and so I was doubly disappointed.

Comments:

Did Walter undo the seat belt when he was examining the car, and if so, is he responsible for Olivia flying out of the car?  Would she have materialized inside the fastened seat belt and not crashed through the window?

I might need to re-watch the season finale from last season in order to make a possible comment about conservation of momentum between the multiverses and the car accident, but I don’t have it anymore.

Do FBI agents need search warrants anymore?  It sure looks like they just busted into that guy’s home without even announcing themselves.  What judge would grant a warrant on the evidence Jessup had anyway?

Is Astrid in some kind of disciplinary program in the FBI that she is relegated to coffee girl duty in the Fringe division?  How come the FBI forgot to reassign her when they shut down the Fringe division?  (I can forgive the continued occupation of Walter’s lab with the excuse that the rent is payed through the end of the month.)  This is a pathetically underused character in the show;  I’d be interested in seeing the writers make more use of her in at least one episode.

Why doesn’t anyone have any common sense anytime a doppelganger is involved, especially ones so easily detected by close physical examination?  ANYTIME AND EVERY TIME a doppleganger has been involved, and someone has been by themselves or away from the rest of the group, CHECK THEM OUT, NO EXCEPTIONS !!!

It’s interesting to note that the Fringe division of the FBI has direct congressional oversight.  I wonder how many other subdivisions of the FBI have such status?

Posted in Fringe, Science, Television | 1 Comment »

Eureka: Recycling Bad SF Physics.

Posted by Karl Withakay on July 27, 2009

Eureka

Eureka

This post kind of goes off on a tangent for a while, but I felt it was necessary to give an insight to my thought processes regarding deconstruction science fiction in general, seeing as this is my first sci-fi deconstruction.

It’s not my intention to do much deconstruction of the show Eureka, mostly because the show doesn’t take itself as seriously as, say, Fringe does, but this week’s episode, “Insane in the P-Brane” the writers went to the classic sci-fi plot file drawer and pulled out the “We’ve been shifted to another dimension  and nobody can see us.” plot, and recycled the plot point’s huge holes along with it.

It seems like every SF series has to do the episode where one or more characters somehow gets shifted out of phase, into another dimension, or is otherwise modified such that nobody can see them and they can’t interact with the world around them.  Star Trek TNG, StarGate SG-1, and numerous others have done it.   So aside from the bad physics plot points it always creates, it smacks of lazy writing to recycle the idea, especially since nobody ever manages to take that idea and make it their own by doing something really different with it.   Note to Sci-Fi writers out there:  Feel free to recycle a plot idea, but be sure to do something different with it to differentiate your story from every one else’s.

It’s not really fair to deconstruct science fiction in the same way you would a spy thriller.  Almost all science fiction includes elements that are against the known laws of physics, and are just not possible in reality, and Eureka is a fairly over the top show in that regard.  So, when deconstructing science fiction, you have to draw the lines of what you’ll accept and what is BS.

There are a couple of keys to creating an acceptable science fiction universe:  explanation and consistency.

#1  Explanation:  First establish a (fictional) explanation for a phenomenon to make it acceptable.*  As bad as a movie and as riddled with bad physics as The Core was, I give the nod to them, on Unobtainium.  By calling the hull material unobtainium, they basically acknowledged to us that the properties of the hull alloy they put in the story were BS asked us to accept it and move on, and there’s nothing wrong with that in science fiction.

#2  Consistency:  Once you define your sci-fi universe, it has to be internally self consistent.  That’s not to say that you’re necessarily locked into the universe as you defined it, but you must at least provide an explanation for any changes that contradict the previously established laws of your universe.  You can’t have warp drive tearing holes in time and space in one episode and forget about it while blazing away at warp 9 in later episodes unless you explain that new technology has been introduced to correct the issue.

Implied by #’s 1 & 2 is that any sci-fi universe is pretty much governed by the same rules as our own, except as otherwise specified.  This may seem blindingly obvious, but this Zeroth Key (With a nod to the Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics) is the basis for most of my science fiction deconstruction as you’ll soon see below.

I’m not going to deal with the specifics of this  Eureka episode, but I will instead address the plot point in general.  I’ll also add that in science fiction, I am more likely to accept a sci-fi plot point with gaping  holes in it if it’s the first time that plot point has been used.  I’ll have less tolerance for followup uses of that plot point that continue to fail to address those same holes.

For the sake of science fiction, I will accept that a person could be phase or dimension shifted such that they cannot interact with the rest of the world, but let’s look into what that would actually mean.

In the universe we live in, which is the only one we know about, there are four funamental forces through which all things can interact, and all interactions between any matter or energy involve these four forces.

Without going into physics 101, electromagnitism is the force most responsible for our interaction with the world around us.  The ability to see light, feel heat, and touch objects is all a result of the matter in our bodies interacting through the electromagnetic force with the matter and energy around us.

The plot holes in dimension/phase shifting mostly revolve around  gravity and electromagnetism.  If you’re phase shifted from the rest of the universe and can’t interact with it, you should no longer be attracted to the Earth by the force of gravity, since the Earth is in a different phase or dimension, and your momentum from before you were shifted should cause you to be flung tangentially off of the face of the earth.

For the sake of plot convenience, let’s assume that the force of gravity permeates dimensions/phases such that you can still interact gravitationally with the rest of the universe unaffected by your shift.  (We have to assume the strong and weak nuclear forces do not permeate phases, or there would be  all sorts of nasty, but interesting nuclear interactions to occur as you interact with  matter from the normal world with out the benefit of electromagnetic repulsion.)  In that case, you should fall through the surface Earth ending up in a nearly linear, highly elliptical orbit around the Earth’s center of mass ranging from surface to surface since you can no more interact with the stuff the Earth is made of than you can the stuff other people and door knobs are made of.

Speaking of door knobs, how come these plot points always involve normal world humans walking through the phase shifted people, but the phase shifted people almost never just walk through walls to get to where they’re going?  I mean, they can walk through other people, they can’t interact with the computers to type out a cry for help, but they are somehow blocked from passing through the walls and floors without at least a made up explanation, what’s the deal?

Another thing to consider is that the phase shifted persons should not be able to see anything of the unshifted world (or themselves unless they posses their own light source), as their eyes cannot interact with the unshifted photons of light from the rest of the universe.  We’ll have to stipulate that the phase shifted persons can somehow interact with photons (energy), but not matter from the unshifted world if we want them to be able to see.   This would also slow down the rate at which they freeze to death:  they could then receive heat from the sun and   surrounding matter via thermal radiation, but not via conduction or convection.

Of course, all this is also ignoring that fact that the shifted persons should not be  able to breath unshifted air, and should therefore suffocate fairly quickly.

So, can one use the phase/dimension shifting plot point and avoid some or most of these plot holes?  Here’s my plot outline of a phase shifting story that minimizes the holes.  A ship’s engine’s fail in the dead of interstellar space.  One or more crew members must go EVA to fix the problem, and there is some soft of “event” that causes them to be phase shifted, and they are stranded with a finite amount of life support and thruster jet fuel left in their EVA suits.  They must find a way to return themselves to normal or at least alert the ship to their predicament before either their life support runs out or the ship is repaired and leaves them behind.

The action of the story focuses on the actions of the rest of the crew as they try to determine what happened to their crew mates and the interaction between the two shifted crew members as they try to resolve their situation.   (They can see each other via the lights on their suits.)

AFTER POST UPDATES BELOW:

* This can also be thought of as acknowledging the absurdity.  By acknowledging the absurdity, you premptively point out your own plot hole instread of leaving it to the viewer to criticize.

I forgot to add the sound perception plot hole.   Even if you stipulate that shifted persons can see the non-shifted world via some sort of two way mirror effect for photons from the non-shifted world, if they can’t interact with matter from the non-shifted world, then they shouldn’t be able to hear anything from the non-shifted world as their ear drums cannot interact with the air molecules in which sound from the unshifted world propogates.

Posted in Eureka, Science, Space, Television | Leave a Comment »